Published on Feb 23, 2014: Dr. Michio Kaku and Jack Mirkinson on why the media continue to present human impact on climate change as questionable.
On the climate and the solutions.
Climate State
Covering the climate crisis and the solutions. Climate change media and news.
Before the flood we probably had a water layer in the atmosphere that fell
out of suspension, causing the flood. I see global (warming) change as a
possible step to return the water to the atmosphere. The basis for this
thought can be found in Revelation. Revelation 21:1 And I saw a new
heaven and a new earth; for the former heaven and the former earth had
passed away, and the sea is no more.
Some peoples obsession with “Al Gore this, Al Gore that” is down straight
embarrassing. Even the most famous scientist won’t ever earn as much money
in their entire life as one Oil manager does on one day! So much for the
“bribe” argument. 😉
Here’s how this shit works:
The more crime Obama/Holder/Clinton/Feinstein/ETC need to cover up, the
louder the networks will scream about “save the world” marketing, to help
to move the spotlight off them raping our Constitution.
After that plane vanished didn’t think CNN covered actual important news.
Fox, CNN, and all the corporate media is trying to spin this event into a debate. They don’t want their corporate sponsors to pull their ad money so they will cover the story in a different light. They will make it seem like they are trying to be fair, but in reality they just want the story to go away so they can keep making money. This reminds me of the dust bowl. People were warned not to over farm and destroy top soil as it serves as a protective barrier against the wind. Even as the sands where covering… Read more »
Since when is science determined by consensus?
The fossil fuel industry giants are winning. Through ideology and partisan politics they’ve convinced average people and implanted politicians to ignore the facts and pose the skeptical arguments for them. It’s truly saddening. The evidence is overwhelming, “in the scientific community it’s a settled question.” And, instead of debating ideas of solutions we’re debating the validity of proven science. Who gains from this? Well, those who profit from fossil fuels. Exxon Mobil, the American Petroleum Institute…, the very same corporations and groups that fund the opposing arguments like that of the NGIPCC. Those who somehow argue that humans have no… Read more »
“Why don’t we call it Global Warming again?” “Oh, that’s because Global
Warming is a giant crock of shit and everybody knows it. By calling it
Climate Change, we can continue our agenda of blaming humans.” Well folks
you heard it here. Global warming really is dead. The Earth stopped warming
16 years ago s they call it Climate Change now. As if humans are
responsible for Climate Change. How much money will it take to stop the
climate from changing? 80 degrees for everyone on the planet all year round
can be yours for the low low price of…
the 97% number is 100% fake and the only way they came to that number was
carefully selecting who to ask
Our own government is poisoning us via chemtrails and h.a.r.r.p.
Uncle Sam even published a manual of how he’s doing it. Google
‘Owning The Weather In 2025’. It’s not conspiracy. It’s a fact!!
And do look up next time you go outside. Those are chemicals raining
down on YOU, your kids, your pets, your food.. yikes!
Global warming is a scam. It’s so much of a scam that they changed the name
to climate change because the Earth hasn’t warmed in 17 years. In that 17
years co2 has gone up. There I just debated it. The “scientist” they bring
on are Bill Nye, and the paranormal investigator. Neither one of them are
climate scientist. There are 1000s of scientist speaking out about this.
CNN on record receives 100s of millions of Dollars a year from the US to
spread this propaganda.
Climate change is a natural occurrence, its been happening for about 4
billion years. Attempts to blame humanity for it is patently absurd, like
throwing a firecracker into a blazing building and blaming the firecracker
for the damage. I know we should reduce pollution, even if only for
ourselves; but forcing me to use cancer-causing lightbulbs will not “save
the planet”!
Yeah they do have two side and yes climate change still have this, ask
environmental historians, they do question this a lot given a lot of these
people have political agenda and many of these models have been proven
dead wrong and even the science has been proven off or dead wrong.
World’s top climate scientists told to ‘cover up’ the fact that the Earth’s
temperature hasn’t risen for the last 15 years
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2425775/Climate-scientists-told-cover-fact-Earths-temperature-risen-15-years.html
the main problem i have is that its entirely based on the theory of irradience, were the long length waves are supposed to be trapped by these green house gas’s in the upper troposphere and thats were this change should primarily be taken place, but temperatures in the upper troposphere arnt rising as much as on the ground, but for the theory to be true it should be getting hotter up higher quicker and the ground should be lagging, how can this be real if this isnt the case seeing as thats the entire basis for it? and why do… Read more »
The debate isn’t really about whether climate change exists or not. It’s about how much of it is man made and whether or not humanity is facing catastrophic consequences as the alarmists would have everyone believe. In order to begin to understand why so much debate still exists you first need to accept that science doesn’t exist to provide us with proof or truth and it’s definitely not about “consensus”. The practice of scientific investigation involves tools to help us explain how the physical world MIGHT work. The explanation doesn’t have to be true to be useful, just consistent with… Read more »
Geoengineering
Dr. Michio Kaku – Total Quack
You know when to be suspicious when REAL skeptics are called “deniers” in
an attempt to group them in with “Holocaust deniers”. Other scientists
have asked legitimate questions and have been shouted down for doing so.
That is not science!
Even if man made global warming were real, which it’s not, how would giving
Al Gore money fix this? What good does it do to shut down clean burning
plants here, when they’re opening up dirty ones in China? Why are the
dirtiest plants like GE’s allowed to operate? Is it because huge corps.
like GE run this country? It’s all designed to destroy competition, and
steal our money.
Global warming fake
They say climate change. They don’t say global cooling. They don’t say global warming. These alarmist started out trying to panic people about a coming ice age. When that didn’t get any traction they switched it to global warming. Now that even the UN has to admit that, there is no global warming, they are switching it to Climate Change. What does that even mean? Does it mean that the climate must be changing but they don’t know wether it is getting warmer or colder. Let’s face it. It’s a scam. The global warming guys don’t really want it colder.… Read more »
Debates are entirely inappropriate when discussing science. Aristotle and
his rhetoric have provided humanity with zero insight over the past 2400
years. Science is about empiricism, not dialogue.
The negative effects of humanity on the planet are obvious and everywhere.
How can anyone not see that?
This is Journalistic Malpractice.
yes we all agree the climate is changing. It would be really scary if it
didn’t. Kaku is full of shit. The ones who do have data is the Deniers! The
models failed miserably.
Satellite measurement show lack of warming trend in the last decade and a
half. Here is your data Kaku!
Our planet has survived things worse than climate change, we on the other
hand…
9 out of 10 dentists say brushing your teeth with paste helps prevent
cavities…
… So, let’s go with that one dentist. Eh?
“we’re not going to be prepared for the future” – Michio Kaku. Millions
are being affected worldwide by extreme and catastrophic weather. Should
we be spending more time and energy responding to the situation, than
debating? If so, what can we each do in response, preparation and
amelioration of conditions that are likely to affect each of us at some
point? http://www.GreatWavesOfChange.org
The answer to this “man-made global warming” problem is for the warmists
lapdogs to sterilize or depopulate themselves so they can reduce their
“carbon footprint.” LOL! Get lives.. You CNN watching sheep are in the
wrong fight. The spraying of aluminum and barium into the atmosphere has
more to do with climate change than the burning of fossil fuels.
The A.M.A. and Surgeons General testified in congress in 1969 that smoking causes lung cancer and nowadays scientists know that human actions are causing climate change. The tobacco industry testified before congress in 1969 that the science was not settled due to the fact that they hadn’t caused lung cancer in any animal from cig smoke and now our fossil fuel interests are saying similarly that we haven’t done a scientific study on planets to prove that our actions cause climate change, so, science is not settled. I’m pleased to hear James Hansen solemnly declare that scientists who deny this… Read more »
The 97% consensus is a complete fallacy. That 2,500 IPCC connected scientists agreed climate change was man-made, when the actual number was only 25. In shock at the paltry numbers, the Univerisity of Illinois solicited 10,257 earth scientists with a measley 2 question online survey and only 77 took the survey! 77 out of 10,257 scientists took the 2 question survey!! And 75 of the 77 scientists agreed with the two questions asked in the survey; That’s how they got their rediculous 97% consensus, lol! Anybody who believes that there is a 97% consensus is a fool just like that… Read more »
Climate change isn’t debatable, I agree with that. But what is debatable,
is if C02 is the cause of climate change. Every prediction, every computer
model prediction were HUGELY false. The sun is mostly the cause of climate
change and the burning of fossil fuels is very miniscule, but that won’t
stop the sheep from lapping this propaganda up.
Odd hearing this on CNN but glad it happened.
#climatechange #journalism
The earth goes through natural changes. Google lost lands and read about
natural changes dating back to prehistoric dino eras. Humans as intelligent
beings want to control the future. Mother nature will not be controlled.
Ok climate change means climate change not global warming it could mean
it’s getting colder and why do you even want global warming to be true
“climate change” is a religion of the UN.
No but it can be fixed. Lol.
I’m Jesus I think. Yes it’s man made.
The truth will set us ALL FREE!!!
Great video – thanks. So why debate the irrefutable? News organizations are
an entertainment BUSINESS; perhaps debating climate change plays to the
buying demographic. As for the those is denial; when do some people put
their seatbelts on? AFTER the accident… if they’re still around. The
EVIDENCE meant nothing to them. Sometimes it takes disaster to convince,
and even then…