To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Learn more about the data usage on this website.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
The old fairy with the false teeth dyes his hair. Americans are insane.
LOL – Time Magazine is not a scientific journal.
The idea that a specific filed of science was wrong in the past is a joke. You go back in time for any field and you will find a time when the theory was updated or just was in complete disagreement with today’s ideas. Take gravitational theory. Since we can show relativity change things should we toss out everything and believe angels are holding us down? Also, what has changed since the 1960’s? What was the average speed of PC’s back then? How many satellites were studding climate change? How many climatologist were there? How much data did we have… Read more »
LOL – Time Magazine is not a scientific journal.
The idea that a specific filed of science was wrong in the past is a joke. You go back in time for any field and you will find a time when the theory was updated or just was in complete disagreement with today’s ideas. Take gravitational theory. Since we can show relativity change things should we toss out everything and believe angels are holding us down? Also, what has changed since the 1960’s? What was the average speed of PC’s back then? How many satellites were studding climate change? How many climatologist were there? How much data did we have… Read more »
I love how idiots like Lou Dobbs think they can debate science with
scientists.
“We know that venus is hot because it has an atmosphere full of carbon dioxide, we also know that mars is cold because it doesn’t have much carbon dioxide and so we know that more carbon dioxide heats up the planet.. so while there is some natural variability we knos there is going to be a long term warming trend, and you can see the smart money already starting to take advantage of this by looking into mining opportunities in the arctic where it was formerly ice covered and so I think we need to understand that the science is… Read more »
What?!! Fukushima is devastating our Earth “the planet”.
Disgusting. Caldeira says one thing while the “banner caption” says the
exact opposite. Whatever Caldeira says Dobbs asks question that imply the
exact opposite.
Murdoch and his spitlickle cronies have fine tuned their propaganda
techniques to a fine pitch.
We ARE having our timely pole shift as well. Since none of us alive today
knows how that works, our best shot is probably reading up on Noah.
Time magazine picked Adolph Hitler as their 1938 man of the year, too.
Dobbs brings up the “scientists used to believe global cooling” debunked
hokum, but Caldeira be-atch slapped him with the real story and truth of
the matter.
Lou Dubious is a stupid idiot. He is obviously cherry picking statistics.
I used to think that Lou Dobbs had integrity.
You just can’t replace the massive amount of fossil fuel with nuclear
energy. You would have to convert electricity and warmth into bacteria or
algae which will then become some ort of bio fuel. To establish this
process on a massive scale you would need decades. It’s just not feasible.
Nulear power is not a solution but a distraction from what we really need
to to: establish a carbon tax.
Will someone tell Lou that Time is NOT a science mag.
this “scientist” is a moron. there is NO baby in the bath water of nuclear
energy. it’s all bath water — NO BABY! nuclear energy is shit! get rid of
it!! along with oil and fracking! release the suppressed renewable free
energy technologies already for fuck’s sake!