The collapse of complex societies of the past can inform the present on the risks of collapse. Dr. Joseph Tainter, author of the book The Collapse of Complex societies, and featured in Leonardo Dicaprio’s film The Eleventh Hour, details the factors that led to the collapse of past civilizations including the Roman Empire.
2010 International Conference on Sustainability: Energy, Economy, and Environment organized by Local Future nonprofit and directed by Aaron Wissner. http://localfuture.org
Related
Civilisation Collapse
▶ Collapse of Complex Societies by Dr. Joseph Tainter – YouTube
The growth in complexity seems to be a problem of Governments – having no
direct cost benefit feedback.
Unfortunately not only Governments grow in complexity, they also happen to
prevent Business Cycle from occurring, keeping ‘too big to fail’ businesses
shielded by interest rate manipulation or direct subsidies, in order to
maintain status quo – employment etc.
Maybe the solution is to shrink the Government and allow recessions in
Business Cycle to clear the dead wood – companies which grow too complex
for their own benefit.
In centralized society the collapse is inevitable. But in diversified
society the collapses can be just local, concerning few companies or
regions and therefore mild.
The second last question after the talk is where our solutions may lie in:
the facilitation of more long-term temporal ideas in the education system
to begin a new generation of long-term thinkers, those that are curious
enough to explore these kind of problems and apply their temporal
knowledge. These problems that lead to societal collapse may be due to the
way the educational system is designed and the fruit of that system isn’t
geared towards thinking in more collectivistic manner that progresses
through time and space. Tainter said that humans are generally not evolved
to think on such a long-term scale. Maybe we need a conscious evolution, we
have the right hardware (our brains) but we need to change and update the
software (our ideas).
starts out pretty good. problems. steady state is a myth. growth isn’t
required. change is required. isn’t that clear? when we change our energy
efficiency – America and cut its fossil fuel consumption by 80% – or 800
billion dollars or more a year.
that’ll save a trillion dollars a year, get rid of pollution and the
illness that is causing globally. That’s *change* in human behavior.
Rideshare, better cars, electric cars, LED lights. That’s happening.
America is using less fossil fuel than ever. Growth in China’s standard of
living doesn’t mean growth in consumption. It means better clothing, better
transportation, better. not more.
Collapse isn’t likely unless economic leaders continue to dream that more
consumption is better. Sustainability is a contextual thing. Not converting
the Earth into crap that is useless is how you address sustainable use of
planetary resources.
We convert uranium into the worst pollution on the planet, but weight. We
convert fossil oil/gas into substances we can’t re-capture and re-use. That
kind of insanity leads to collapse. However, we convert plants into energy
we use to walk and talk and find ways to convert the output of humans or
living things, into stuff that is re-useable.
Productivity in innovation is all wrong in those slides. patent output does
not equal improvement in efficiency, recovery and re-use of resources. And
the last 2 years of innovation in alternative energy in those charts showed
a massive uptick. Since GOP Congress cut funding, it may have returned
downward.
Patents are not very useful in highly innovative fields. They could be
entirely useless in 2 years where innovation is high-speed. His chart on
innovations in communications systems is entirely wrong. Communications
speed, quality and lower price, lower energy consumption are exploding.
Not a very good appraisal of innovation. Complexity? Nature is the most
complex thing out there, our ability to create complex symbols to
communicate what we know about it, to predict disasters and avoid them, is
great.
Humans overall, need to *change* patterns of behavior, not *grow*consumption.
This was a very good presentation by Dr. Tainter after having read his book
and that of Jared Diamond. However, he failed to mention the role of the
immutable law of entropy in the collapse or mutation of complex systems. I
cannot go into detail on this forum, but there was a book written by Jeremy
Rifikin in 1980 by the name “Entropy – A New World View.” Simply, it
answers a lot of the questions of why complex systems eventually collapse
and new systems emerge.
This was a really insightful presentation, thank you.
I cannot stress how important this video and this guys work is. Anyone who
is interested in society and the future will find this video very
informative.
This should be taught in school for the future of our society
instructive. Thank you
They are people who benefit from a complex system and who in fact try to
make the system more complex, just because they can hide themselves into
this system. More complex is the system, more hidden they are, they think.
Internet is a simplification of our mutual information exchanges, which
allow us to see those who are hidden.
check out “Sustainability 101: Exponential Growth – Arithmetic, Population
and Energy (Full – Updated)”
see : Red queen’s race
Yes, it can be.
Power and complexity is actually the same thing
What I can say about the social complexity is that it bears no benefits. In
the end it is an act of sidestepping problems on one side to face it later
on the other side.
Most important video on youtube!
I find that MOST people don’t really grasp what Tainter is talking about,
because in the end they are always looking for an “out” to this situation.
There IS no “out,” it is like the frog who fell into the buttermilk pail…
keep kicking, or die. Human civilization, and possibly life itself, is too
complex to survive in a steady state. There have been and will be further
collapses, and no amount of R&D will prevent the next collapse.
While there are other alternative energy sources there is not one that is
simple, portable and as varied in useage as oil…………..we don’t have
a substitute for that is more of what he is implying…………wind and
solar where just examples stated, not the be all to end all……
The problem: the system was/ is not set-up for efficiency or
sustainability. In fact, the system was created by governments to be
unstable and inefficient long-term in order to gain short term rewards. The
politicians engage in vote buying through unsustainable government
programs, regulation, restrictions, taxation, etc. that needlessly
increases complexity within the economy and society. Meanwhile, governments
also fail to fulfill its basic duties, because more complexity brings more
power.
its about control
get your balls out
No mention of entropy? Hmm. The w.roman empire failed completely within two
hundred years and it had an energy consumption of about one hundreth of
ours? “Sustainability” is another human myth, as is “environmental
protection” and “environmental remediation” by industry. Ecosystem
sustainability has been subverted by human industry over and over again as
a claim of man’s dominion over all living things. The time is near when
humans reconnect with the program of ecosystem morality.
The key difference is that while Jared Diamond believes environmental
problems caused the collapse of societies Tainter has made the case that
the cause was economic, rooted in the structure of society itself.
Honestly, Diamond’s work looks like more enviro fear mongering. The
environmental problems he talks about had happened previously, yet the
societies discussed didn’t collapse. Primitivism is tempting, but it’s a
road to nowhere.
Great presentation – very thought provoking, raises serious long term questions about the future for human civilisation even setting aside the apparent inevitability of collapse for the current one (ie there will be more civilisations later). How can one predicate a civilisation on a long term sustainable basis without collapse becoming an inevitable outcome – not a simple question apparently.
An excellent lecture.
Tell me the reason that Energy and Complexity are functionally intertwined.
Please use your understanding of the Laws of Classical Physics in your
answer. Please present your answer in an Aristotelian Logical Format with
Two Premises and the Conclusion.. Do you have a grasp of what Dr. Tainter
is saying? You listened to the presentation. Do you think broadly? Those
people have a better grasp than most. The answer to my question deals with
Thermodynamics. Specifically it deals with Entropy.
“Are all societies doomed to collapse” That *would* explain the Fermi
Paradox.
In terms of “choosing to fail or succeed” an example I believe Jared
Diamond uses in his book is the Hopi Indians as a successful society. Also,
the sea faring peoples of northern greenland vs the greenland norse. The
choice was adopting some of the food practices of the sea hunting indians
vs attacking them and recording that they bleed. This was a choice that the
greenland norse made. They consciously choose to have these locals as their
enemies instead of learning from them.
Would have made more sense if this was cast as “Collapse of Complex Systems”
Good grief, some of those students asking questions at the end are examples
of why we are screwed. They ‘listened’ to the presentation but still have
no grasp of what Dr Tainter is saying.
Basic income is the aswer and solution for all troubles.
very informative video, thanks for the upload !
the problem is there are to many, my life boat is being polluted with to
much shit!