Lou Dobbs (FOX News) and Climate Scientist Ken Caldeira

What’s happening with climate change?Climate scientist Ken Caldeira on what’s […]

Post Author:

Climate State

Date Posted:

January 4, 2014

What’s happening with climate change?
Climate scientist Ken Caldeira on what’s really going on with climate change and record temperatures.

Release URL http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/lou-dobbs-tonight/index.html

About the Author: Climate State

Profile photo ofadmin
Climate State covers the broad spectrum of climate change, and the solutions, since around 2011 with the focus on the sciences. Views expressed on this site or on social media are not necessarily the views by Climate State – we endorse data, facts, empirical evidence.

17 Comments

  1. ClimateState January 4, 2014 at 3:54 am - Reply
  2. mogem January 4, 2014 at 4:23 am - Reply

    Will someone tell Lou that Time is NOT a science mag.

  3. Ken Shackleton January 4, 2014 at 5:57 am - Reply

    I used to think that Lou Dobbs had integrity.

  4. frededison January 4, 2014 at 7:21 am - Reply

    Time magazine picked Adolph Hitler as their 1938 man of the year, too.
    Dobbs brings up the “scientists used to believe global cooling” debunked
    hokum, but Caldeira be-atch slapped him with the real story and truth of
    the matter.

  5. splatmanoz January 4, 2014 at 7:59 am - Reply

    Disgusting. Caldeira says one thing while the “banner caption” says the
    exact opposite. Whatever Caldeira says Dobbs asks question that imply the
    exact opposite.

    Murdoch and his spitlickle cronies have fine tuned their propaganda
    techniques to a fine pitch.

  6. pcuimac January 4, 2014 at 4:42 pm - Reply

    Lou Dubious is a stupid idiot. He is obviously cherry picking statistics.

  7. pcuimac January 4, 2014 at 4:50 pm - Reply

    You just can’t replace the massive amount of fossil fuel with nuclear
    energy. You would have to convert electricity and warmth into bacteria or
    algae which will then become some ort of bio fuel. To establish this
    process on a massive scale you would need decades. It’s just not feasible.
    Nulear power is not a solution but a distraction from what we really need
    to to: establish a carbon tax.

  8. loboalamo January 4, 2014 at 9:39 pm - Reply

    What?!! Fukushima is devastating our Earth “the planet”.

  9. loboalamo January 4, 2014 at 9:42 pm - Reply

    We ARE having our timely pole shift as well. Since none of us alive today
    knows how that works, our best shot is probably reading up on Noah.

  10. Myaucat January 10, 2014 at 2:19 am - Reply

    this “scientist” is a moron. there is NO baby in the bath water of nuclear
    energy. it’s all bath water — NO BABY! nuclear energy is shit! get rid of
    it!! along with oil and fracking! release the suppressed renewable free
    energy technologies already for fuck’s sake!

  11. 10Elmer10 February 17, 2014 at 9:57 pm - Reply

    I love how idiots like Lou Dobbs think they can debate science with
    scientists.

  12. eddiethehyena February 23, 2014 at 6:28 am - Reply

    “We know that venus is hot because it has an atmosphere full of carbon
    dioxide, we also know that mars is cold because it doesn’t have much carbon
    dioxide and so we know that more carbon dioxide heats up the planet.. so
    while there is some natural variability we knos there is going to be a long
    term warming trend, and you can see the smart money already starting to
    take advantage of this by looking into mining opportunities in the arctic
    where it was formerly ice covered and so I think we need to understand that
    the science is basically right”

    Snappity-Snap little Mr Fox man!

  13. OccamsRzzr March 28, 2014 at 4:17 am - Reply

    LOL – Time Magazine is not a scientific journal.

  14. OccamsRzzr March 28, 2014 at 4:17 am - Reply

    LOL – Time Magazine is not a scientific journal.

  15. OccamsRzzr March 28, 2014 at 4:24 am - Reply

    The idea that a specific filed of science was wrong in the past is a joke.
    You go back in time for any field and you will find a time when the theory
    was updated or just was in complete disagreement with today’s ideas. Take
    gravitational theory. Since we can show relativity change things should we
    toss out everything and believe angels are holding us down? Also, what has
    changed since the 1960’s? What was the average speed of PC’s back then?
    How many satellites were studding climate change? How many climatologist
    were there? How much data did we have in comparison to today.

  16. OccamsRzzr March 28, 2014 at 4:24 am - Reply

    The idea that a specific filed of science was wrong in the past is a joke.
    You go back in time for any field and you will find a time when the theory
    was updated or just was in complete disagreement with today’s ideas. Take
    gravitational theory. Since we can show relativity change things should we
    toss out everything and believe angels are holding us down? Also, what has
    changed since the 1960’s? What was the average speed of PC’s back then?
    How many satellites were studding climate change? How many climatologist
    were there? How much data did we have in comparison to today.

  17. Robbie Hudson April 21, 2014 at 3:51 am - Reply

    The old fairy with the false teeth dyes his hair. Americans are insane.

See also  Chris Hayes & Michael Mann: There’s Global Warming - And It’s Snowing

Leave a Reply

Categories: 2014, Climate Change Denial(2023)
Views: 232(2023)
post contents

The Climate State Newsletter