Climate & Earthquakes II
762 Views0 Comments0 Likes
Part II Image “Earthquake Response” by Matthew M. Bradley / U.S. Navy
Climate & Earthquakes I
647 Views0 Comments0 Likes
Climate forcing of geological and geomorphological hazardsBy Bill McGuire / UCL
Playing God with the Climate IV
481 Views0 Comments0 Likes
Part IV Background image “Aerosol Eruptions” by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Playing God with the Climate III
432 Views0 Comments0 Likes
Part III Background image “Aerosol Eruptions” by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Playing God with the Climate II
461 Views0 Comments0 Likes
Part II Background image “Aerosol Eruptions” by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Playing God with the Climate I
623 Views0 Comments0 Likes
'The Ultimate Technofix': Playing God with the ClimateBy Clive Hamilton / CAPPE Background image “Aerosol Eruptions” by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Calls for Emissions Reductions
530 Views1 Comments0 Likes
US national security advisor says climate change is threat, calls for Emissions ReductionsBy Carl Franzen / The Verge Background image “President Barack Obama talks with National Security Advisor Tom Donilon” by Th...
The fragile fringe of West Antarctica
656 Views0 Comments1 Likes
Expedition to a crumbling Antarctic ice shelfBy Ted Scambos / NSIDC Background image “The Getz Ice Shelf in Antarctica” by Ted Scambos
The Warming went into the Deep
626 Views3 Comments0 Likes
The answer is blowing in the wind: The warming went into the deep endBy Rasmus Benestad / RealClimate Background image “So Deep” by tata_aka_T
A Carbon tax would only correct a minor part of the greater species problem. It alone would not assure human survival. At the core of the issue are those external costs not being recognized in pricing. Given the assumption that capital markets are here to stay in one form or the other, the statement can be made as seen in my letter to Paul Krugman (see http://www.InquiryAbraham.com Blog Tab) that in order for human ecological survival, all external costs need to be measured and priced in up front so as to encourage, discourage, temper, or at the extreme eliminate investment. Also, we must understand; implicit in this assumption is that only government can be in a position to recognize these negative external costs. To the extent that the economics profession has not been an influence on government in this regard, it has now become a large part of the problem.